Dilemma denken
Combine opposites. Don't choose between them.
Every organisation lives with competing demands — stability and growth, long and short term, tradition and innovation, central direction and local autonomy. The challenge is to integrate the opposites, not to pick one at the expense of the other. Dilemma Thinking is the mindset that makes integration practical.
"The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function."
— F. Scott Fitzgerald
"Without contraries there is no progression."
— William Blake
Either-or is a choice. Both-and is a compromise. Through-through is a reconciliation.
Start here
Two propositions in conflict. One answer that strengthens both.
The word "dilemma" in Greek means "two propositions in conflict". We meet a dilemma when we face a choice between two opposing options, both with real advantages — and both with a price if we pick only one.
Thirty years of research across cultures and industries has shown that dealing with opposing options is not about choosing. The key is reconciliation — the art of combining opposites so that each side strengthens the other. That takes a shift of mindset that can feel counter-intuitive to those trained on bipolar models: past either-or, past both-and, to through-through.
Reconciliation is not a compromise. A compromise gives up something on each side. A reconciliation asks a sharper question: how can we get more of value X through value Y, and more of Y through X?
Dilemmas are not choices to be made. They are tensions to be reconciled.
Watch
Dilemma Thinking in practice.
A short introduction to the mindset and the method.
The method
Six steps from dilemma to daily practice.
The Dilemma Reconciliation Process is a framework that works across cultures, functions and industries. It moves teams beyond either-or and beyond both-and, into through-through. Three decades of case studies confirm the same pattern: reconciling values makes business measurably more effective.
1 Identify the dilemma
Surface the tensions that matter.
Gather information from multiple sources and angles. Recognise the tensions the strategy is actually creating — not the ones leadership assumes are there.
2 Chart the dilemma
Make it specific, then crack the line.
Name the dilemma. Who holds it? What exactly is it about? Frame it as a line with opposites at each end — then crack the line so the team starts combining the poles rather than picking one.
3 Stretch the dilemma
Bigger, bolder, more consequential.
Weak dilemmas produce weak reconciliations. Stretch each side until the real stakes are visible — so the team sees what performance is actually at risk.
4 Make epithets
Name the pathology at each extreme.
When one side goes without the other, what breaks? Speed without safety is recklessness. Consensus without decisiveness is paralysis. Naming the pathology is how a team commits to reconciliation rather than sliding back to one-sidedness.
5 Reconcile
Ask the reconciliation question.
How can we get more of value X through value Y, and more of Y through X? Through-through solutions are the ones where each side genuinely strengthens the other — not a midpoint between them.
6 Action planning
Convert reconciliation into behaviour.
Translate each reconciliation into behaviours, and actions for making changes in structures and processes, specific enough to observe on a Tuesday morning. Until the reconciliation shows up in the way people actually decide under pressure, it hasn't landed.
"The dilemma reconciliation is the methodology at the heart of everything we do. It implies a switch of mindset, that can seem a bit counter-intuitive for Western people, typically used to bipolar models."
— Dr. Fons Trompenaars
Where dilemmas live
Five stakeholders. Ten golden dillemas.
Organisations rarely face one dilemma at a time. They face ten. Three decades of consulting — and a database of forty-five thousand dilemmas between the top five stakeholders of an organisation — reveal the same recurring set. We call them the ten golden dilemmas.
Beheer
Wants efficiency and effectiveness.
Werknemers
Want meaningful, motivating work.
Klanten
Want affordable products and responsive service.
Aandeelhouders
Want return on capital.
Maatschappij
Sets rules for health, safety and the long term.
Connect the five. You get ten.
Each connection is a recurring dilemma.
Beheer
Wereldwijde of gestandaardiseerde producten
Klanten
Lokale smaken, specifieke markten
Beheer
Intellectueel kapitaal benutten
Maatschappij
Innovatieve projecten
Beheer
Operationele wendbaarheid
Aandeelhouders
Strategische duidelijkheid
Beheer
We moeten
meer resultaatgericht
Werknemers
We moeten
onze mensen
Maatschappij
Reputatie in de gemeenschap
Klanten
De wensen van onze klanten vervullen
Klanten
Onze klanten koste wat het kost tevreden stellen
Aandeelhouders
Aandeelhouderswaarde
Werknemers
Anticiperen op de behoeften van klanten
Klanten
De klant heeft altijd "gelijk
Aandeelhouders
Kasstroom op korte termijn behouden
Maatschappij
Investeren in duurzaamheid op lange termijn
Werknemers
Positieve discriminatie
Maatschappij
Gelijke kansen
Werknemers
Onze mensen belonen
voor hun meesterschap
Aandeelhouders
Onze aandeelhouders belonen
voor hun geloof in ons
Laten we praten
Put dilemma thinking to work on your tension.
If a tension in your strategy, culture or leadership keeps reappearing in different forms, you are looking at a dilemma. Let's talk about reconciling it.